It’s a 7-day “smart pillbox”, which uses WiFi to report the exact time when each day’s medication has been taken. It works in conjunction with cloud-based software I wrote that alerts the patient (and/or caregiver) about missed doses by flashing lightbulbs in the house and/or sending text messages. Full details, and a video of it in action, can be found at http://www.pogerlabs.com/pharmassist .
It’s an idea I came up with specifically for the Design Challenge, so I hadn’t originally intended to productize it… but the response has been quite positive, so I’m in the process of sussing out the market now. There are a few related products already in the marketplace, or coming soon; I’m noodling over some unique features I might be able to implement that would make it a successful consumer product.
In the meanwhile, I’ll be demonstrating the device again at the NC Regional Internet of Things event in Durham, NC on Tuesday, January 20. If you like connected gadgets, I encourage you to come see PharmAssist and the other demos that will be presented!
One of the big themes at CES last week was definitely “wearable technology”, or more specifically, biometric monitoring devices.
They ranged from the mass-market type devices (Fitbit and the like) to specific solutions for athletes or people with specific medical conditions.
Here are the companies I saw at CES that were hawking Fitbit-style fitness and sleep trackers for the general public:
- Basis Peak
- LifeTrak: focused on continuous heart-rate monitoring for fitness goals
These companies displayed more specialized/niche products:
- AmpStrip: a patch for 24/7 heart monitoring
- Beddit sleep monitor by Misfit (attached to the bed, not the person)
- hugOne: “the first family sleep monitor”
- iChoice: the standard wristwatch, but also blood pressure monitors, pulse oximeters, etc.
- iHealth: wearables, but also a glucometer, pulse oximeter, scale, etc.
- Omron: wide range of devices
- Sleepace: direct-from-China sleep monitoring device
- Valencell Performtek: licenses technology to monitor “heart rate, respiration rate, and other blood flow parameters”
- Vancive Metria: a continuous-wear digital health monitoring “patch”
- VigiPen: insulin injection and glucose level tracker
- Withings: a wide range of devices, well-designed and well-marketed
And then there was this one:
- Zensorium Being: “The only wearable that continuously tracks your mood, heart rate, activity and provides advanced sleep science insights.” The person at the booth said that it tracks mood based on heart rate. I wonder if it can detect skepticism?
In addition to all the home automation systems I saw battling it out at CES last week, there were the home health monitoring systems. They generally use the same communications layer as the home automation systems (some combination of WiFi, Bluetooth, ZigBee, and/or Z-Wave). The differences seem to be:
- a focus on monitoring (sleep patterns, heart rate, etc.) rather than actions
- supposedly a higher bar in terms of information security
Here are the home health systems I saw at CES:
- Honeywell Seymour (not to be confused with the Honeywell Lyric system for home automation!)
- OnKöl (Their angle: made to be completely remotely administered by caregivers, rather than Granny; just ship it to Granny’s house and you can set it up remotely. Also uses cell networks for its cloud connection, rather than assuming high-speed internet.)
- Qualcomm 2net
It seems odd to need a completely parallel infrastructure to deliver packets to/from these wireless devices, separate from the one used for home automation… but it may be that HIPAA privacy rules (and the like) mandate this.
I toured CES last week, and one of the themes I was struck by was how many companies are duking it out to “run the show” for your networked home devices (by providing the hub that all the devices communicate through).
Most of them use the same underlying wireless protocols (some combination of WiFi, Bluetooth, ZigBee, and/or Z-Wave) to connect to the devices, but as far as I can tell, devices marketed as working with one company’s hub will generally NOT interoperate with the other companies’ hubs. I have personally set up a GE Link lightbulb to be controlled by a SmartThings hub, so interoperability is certainly POSSIBLE, at least in some cases… but it seems like that will not be the general case.
It looks like this industry will be littered with dead bodies (and orphaned customers) over the next two years, while we wait for 2-3 of these systems to defeat the rest of them.
Here are the home-automation connectivity hubs I saw at CES, in alphabetical order:
- First Alert Onelink
- Gigaset Elements
- Honeywell Lyric
- Lowe’s Iris
- Sage by Hughes/Echostar
- Staples Connect (the hub was made by D-Link, but Staples Connect devices won’t work with the D-Link hub or vice versa!)
- WeMo (by Belkin; most of their devices use WiFi and can work with any WiFi access point, but some use ZigBee and thus require a “WeMo Link” WiFi-ZigBee router–currently, they give you a WeMo Link with each pair of WeMo lightbulbs)
Looming over all those home automation systems at CES was a system not on display: Nest. Various systems purported to work with Nest, either now or in the future.
I also saw the Allseen Alliance mentioned at some of these booths… this organization / set of guidelines will supposedly allow devices from different manufacturers to interoperate, but I’m not sure how that will work in practice.